m Text replacement - "{{back to top}}" to "{{Back to the top}}"
 
m Text replacement - "== Examples ==" to "=== Examples ==="
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
: assessment framework
: assessment framework


== Examples ==
=== Examples ===
‘The EPO has emphasized that the formal requirement of designating an inventor does not block the invention from patentability. However, '''assessing''' formal requirements ['''toetsen''' op vormvereisten, vormvereisten '''toetsen'''] takes place prior to the substantive patentability examination. Likewise, if an invention meets the requirements of Articles 52-57 EPC, this has no influence on whether or not the formal requirements are met.’
‘The EPO has emphasized that the formal requirement of designating an inventor does not block the invention from patentability. However, '''assessing''' formal requirements ['''toetsen''' op vormvereisten, vormvereisten '''toetsen'''] takes place prior to the substantive patentability examination. Likewise, if an invention meets the requirements of Articles 52-57 EPC, this has no influence on whether or not the formal requirements are met.’


[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Terms]]
{{Back to the top}}
{{Back to the top}}

Latest revision as of 23:06, 29 November 2023

toetsen

toetsen
test, try, try out, check, examine, analyse
(beoordelen) evaluate, review, examine
(toetsen aan) test against, compare with, match against, confront with
aan de praktijk toetsen
test by practice
aan de wet toetsen
test against the legislation
aan een maatstaf toetsen
benchmark, measure

toetsing

toetsing
evaluation, test, examination, testing, checking
(beoordelen) evaluation, review, examination
toetsingsgrootheid
test statistic
toetsingskader
assessment framework

Examples

‘The EPO has emphasized that the formal requirement of designating an inventor does not block the invention from patentability. However, assessing formal requirements [toetsen op vormvereisten, vormvereisten toetsen] takes place prior to the substantive patentability examination. Likewise, if an invention meets the requirements of Articles 52-57 EPC, this has no influence on whether or not the formal requirements are met.’